Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
February 16, 2010 12:00 AM

Do or Die Time? Microsoft Unveils Windows Phone 7

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #103596
Rating: (6)

This week Microsoft did something it's done all too infrequently over the past several years: It introduced a new product that people were excited to see, generating significant buzz with press, pundits, and consumers alike. Perhaps it's no coincidence that this product—which is awkwardly called Windows Phone 7 Series—is named after Microsoft's only other smash product in the past decade, Windows 7.

In case it's not obvious, Windows Phone 7 Series is the next generation of the venerable Windows Mobile system that's gotten so long in the tooth you can actually see cobwebs in some screens. (OK, not really, but it does feel that way. Some Windows Mobile UIs literally date back to 1996.) And while these two systems do share a common technological foundation and the same general mission, Windows Phone and Windows Mobile veer off very sharply in the way they go about things. That is, Windows Phone is all about the future and about fixing the platform's shortcomings vis-à-vis the iPhone.

To this end, Windows Phone introduces a dynamic, Zune-inspired UI that's all about multitouch flicking of "live tiles," short attention span animations, and integrating virtually every other conceivable Microsoft and third-party service that makes sense. This means Xbox Live, Windows Live, Twitter, and Facebook, as well as more traditional online services—and core Windows Mobile strengths—like email and calendaring, and digital media features around music, videos, and pictures.

Windows Phone may look like it's for the hipper-than-thou college crowd that's currently flocking to the iPhone, but thanks to its deep customization capabilities, I suspect it's going to find a home with business users as well. Third parties—including hardware makers, wireless carriers, and independent developers—are going to be able to create their own live tiles to make custom user experiences. So it's not hard to imagine work-related tiles as well as entertainment and leisure-time tiles that will further blur the line between work and play.

From a hardware standpoint, Microsoft is playing to its historic strengths and working with a wide range of partners to produce innovative, capacitive-screen-based devices that will begin appearing in late 2010, just in time for the holidays. But Microsoft has one-upped Apple by specifying some requirements for these devices, including three prominently placed hardware buttons for Start, Back, and Search. This is genius, because it corrects the iPhone's major problem of not having a Back button and because it creates a nice consistency that will make moving from device to device more seamless.

I still have questions, mostly about backward compatibility and upgrade paths. And I can't wait to see the new system and devices next month at the MIX conference I'll be attending. But for now, I can say for the first time, perhaps ever, that Microsoft might be able to pull off something wonderful with its smartphone software. And it appears to have created a system that will appeal equally to consumers and business users, which is smart because in today's connected world, these two audiences are increasingly one and the same.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Glenn
    2 years ago
    Feb 17, 2010

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

    So, let's get this right (says he writing this on his iPhone on the 0723 train from Brighton to London), you're saying that all previous Windows phones are rubbish and the Zune-based Windows Phone (what is/was a zune?) isn't available until Christmas. Oh boy, Jobs must be quaking in his boots at this.

    Microsoft on Innovation: copy everyone else. Quick lads, we need to make an iPhone - make sure it's got three buttons so it looks different.

    The real problem is that it's not about the hardware and software. Sure, it has to be compelling, but it's nothing without the support of the App Store. Apple are so far ahead on this that it's akin to the other impossible task of Bling catching up Google -- can I remind you that Apple are now running their iTunes Ten Billionth Download competition.

    Now Apple have moved on to the new iPad device which will further consolidate the whole mobile device arena.

    In essence, Microsoft are even further behind where Apple were when they announced the iPhone over three years ago in January 2007 because Microsoft don't have any supporting App Store nor any of the Apple "cool" to push it to market. Microsoft are not even in second position; this is left to Google with their *open source* or FREE Android offering. Microsoft trail a very long way behind Google with their shrinking market position and a device with all the cool of a Sony Walkman.

    It'll be surprising if the manufacturers continue with Windows Phone; I think you'll find they'll go down the Android route as it'll be cheaper.

    Unless Microsoft can produce Harvey sized Bunny out of a *really* big hat, they've lost this market.

  • Rostand
    2 years ago
    Feb 16, 2010

    there was no https option in WinMobi 6 outlook, i think. that ended my option to just use my HTC for email. i felt there was a disconnect between the mobile, exchange and functionality teams.

    if they make the same mistake again or try to make people to use their costly sync solutions, they might as well give it up to blackberry for corporate and apple for consumers, and leave the mobile communications area, period.

  • Jon
    2 years ago
    Feb 16, 2010

    Microsoft needs to upgrade activesync to sync all features of Microsoft Outlook and how about some offline capabilities of Sharepoint too. Until this happens I am sticking with RIM.
    Now if RIM could only produce a touch sensitive, slide out keyboard unit with a decent browser....

  • Bradley
    2 years ago
    Feb 16, 2010

    Is it just me, or do the bland blue "tiles" look very 20th century. I give MS credit for reinventing it UI, but I am not sure this is really the way to go. That and having to pan to see the whole screen. Maybe it will make more sense when you handle the actual device, but to me this seems like a misfire.

  • 1
    2 years ago
    Feb 16, 2010

    "But Microsoft has one-upped Apple by specifying some requirements for these devices, including three prominently placed hardware buttons for Start, Back, and Search. This is genius, because it corrects the iPhone's major problem of not having a Back button and because it creates a nice consistency that will make moving from device to device more seamless."

    How does this one-up Apple? Apple has specific requirements for their hardware as well. Even more specific than Microsoft. That is just a silly comment and shows how you always try and throw shots at Apple, not matter how stupid they sound.

    There is really no need for a back button on the iphone as the UI does not require one. What are you going to go back to? Since the iphone does not multitask, you have to go back to the home screen between applications. That is the back button. I'm not sure exactly how Windows Phone 7 will handle 3rd party applications, and how the back button works there. Will it act just like the home button? Will it return to previous states in the application? Will developers need to code for that? If so, what happens when some apps don't support it. I want to go back to the previous screen, but the app instead goes back to the home page. With their multiscreen spanning UI, the back button is needed for Windows Phone 7 to help navigate. But there is no real need for one with the iphone OS and its single screen UI.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.