Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
October 09, 2003 12:00 AM

OS Market Share: Microsoft Stomps the Competition

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #40481
Rating: (4)

   Despite a rash of gushing news stories about the successes of Apple Computer's Mac OS X (on the client) and Linux (on the server), Windows not only continues to dominate its rivals in both markets but also is  growing in both markets. Market researchers at IDC say that various versions of the Windows desktop and server OSs currently dominate their respective markets and will continue to do so for at least the next 4 years. IDC credits Microsoft's volume-licensing programs for the company's ability to grow its share when it's already the dominant player.
   "As Microsoft has brought in [Windows XP and Windows 2000], there's been a lot of good reasons for customers to go out and buy brand new operating systems," IDC analyst Al Gillen said. "It's probably unrealistic to expect Microsoft to continue to drive the market as hard as it has been [doing]."
   According to the report, "Worldwide Client and Server Operating Environment Market Forecast and Analysis, 2002-2007," Windows desktop OS sales worldwide increased from 93.2 percent of the market in 2001 to 93.8 percent in 2002, accounting for more than $9.75 billion in sales. Various Mac OS versions stalled in second place, with just 2.9 percent of the market (and 2.2 percent of the revenues), although IDC noted that Apple will soon relinquish second place to Linux, which saw desktop growth in 2002 to 2.3 percent of the market. All told, 121 million client OSs shipped in 2002, IDC says; about 113 million were XP, 3.5 million were Mac OS, and 2.9 million were Linux.
   The server side of the equation also has an interesting breakdown. In 2002, Windows Server products owned 55.1 percent of the market, from a unit-shipment standpoint, up from 50.5 percent in 2001. Second-place Linux accounted for 23.1 percent of new shipments, up from 22.4 percent in 2001. Only Windows and Linux saw growth in 2002. Combined, all UNIX OS versions declined 8.9 percent year over year; Novell NetWare fell 12.4 percent.
   IDC also noted that the SCO Group lawsuit against Linux companies is having an effect. "Even if the litigation is resolved, the incident may forever put to rest the notion that Linux is 'free' software that can be deployed on any machine without any accountability for ownership and licensing," the IDC report reads. "This weakens a major area of differentiation between Linux and more commercialized operating environments." However, IDC believes that the SCO lawsuit will be resolved and that Linux use will grow through 2007. Windows Server will still dwarf Linux during that time period, however, the report says. "Microsoft generates about the same amount of OS revenue in 3 days as the entire Linux industry generates in 1 year," IDC notes.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • farizia
    6 years ago
    Jan 08, 2006

    im just studying microsoft for a project, does anyone have any comments about whether microsoft has currentley maintained its awesome competitive position environment in which the company operates?

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Mar 07, 2005

    Is it possible for anyone to say anything even vaguely positive about MS without the embittered minorities (OS wise, not ethnic wise) coming out of the wood work to slam them for this or that, or to point why they are "enlightened" for moving away from MS or their OS's?

    With exception to a home edition of Windows 98 I once had a million years ago - I have never had a problem with any MS software. I have been running XP since it came out and never had problems with it. It never crashed, not got infected, etc. I guess I got lucky with that one huge worm that came out (the realyl big one that even CNN was talking about) as I never got that. If you take of your sytesm, no matter who authored the code, then you dont have anything to worry about. But what is with all the whining? (nevermind, dont asnwer that)
    This guy is just stating facts. If you balance out the free downloads that are not being counted for linux, im sure it is more then balanced out by the amazing amount of pirating that MS deals with - so i think the data and Pual's statements are justified. Case and point - I my XP Pro and VSEA are two expensive peaces of software that I never paid a dime for. (SHHHH, a broke student needs a break, right?)
    Anyway, back into point. Microsfot has its faults, but then so does Apple and Sun. If their systems were such a large market share, you wiuld see the hackers finding ways to screw with those systems too. Are their things better about Linux? YES! Are their things better about Sun? YES! And are their things better about Windows? YES! Just get over it. So OS's have their place, others are just alternatives not meant for the massives.
    Be aware, i never drank the microsoft cool aid - but I also didnt drink the "MS IS AN EVIL EMPIRE" cool aide that a lot of other people have either. Sorry, I like my XP, my VS, my IE, and me Office - deal with it...

    Also, ONE last thing - why do Mac people ask me "do you like contributing to a monopoly(MS)"? when they buy about 90% of their software and 100% of their hardware from ONE company? Monopoly indeed.

    Anyway, to each his own...

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jan 29, 2005

    I imagine that some of this is true. As a small time technician to a small time town, there aren't a lot of servers to work on. And while I fix windows stations all the time, I then come back to my house, and work on my computer, which is running OS X Panther. I have no problems on my computer, but I am constantly fixing problems on Windows. The cost of the Windows OS is rather large and seems invalid compared to a free debian install and a commercial wine to run important common productivity applications.
    On one hand, I am amazed that people stick to what they know so much, that they suffer for it. On the other hand, I'm glad people use windows, otherwise there wouldn't be anything to fix.

  • Scott
    9 years ago
    Oct 21, 2003

    I've added some more info. for your continuing articles on who's stomping whom. Microsoft just plain sucks! Most purchases for companies are either bought by or for dimwits.......oh well!



    International Data Corp. released the results of a study on the server operating system market. Not surprisingly, the server version of Windows came out on top for 2002, with 55.1% of new license shipments. The server version of Linux registered a 23.1% market share for the same period. IDC said this is about as good as it will get for Windows, though. An analyst for the firm predicted that Windows' server market share will likely top out in the neighborhood of 55%.

    Gartner wasn't much more chipper on the subject of Windows. CNET reported that the research firm will issue a report today that adds its voice to the chorus crying out about the dangers of worldwide reliance on Microsoft software. The Gartner report is expected to urge businesses to diversify their desktop software or get swept up in an inevitable "cascading failure" caused by an Internet worm or virus.

  • Scott D
    9 years ago
    Oct 13, 2003

    >Editor's note: How do you know the reverse isn't true? I'm >not sure what you do for a living, but I spend a large >portion of my time, yes, discussing these topics with >large companies. -- Paul

    Never claimed the opposite isn't true as well...

    I'm a Sys-Admin. I'm mostly disagreeing with your blanket
    statement. I can tell you categorically that a lot of the
    Linux installations out there are from freely downloaded
    copies. And these will never show up as "shipments" or
    be counted in all these studies. And sure, the opposite is
    true as well. Say, for an engineering lab to do automated
    testing, I can put 50 Linux systems out there, built from a
    free copy to do what I need to do. (and I have done this,
    just to give an example). I could not do it with Windows
    because we did not have the budget for 50 Win2k seats.

    And for the record, I am a Microsoft customer too. I support all the platforms. Windows, Linux, Solaris.
    Remember, almost all of us Linux users are also Microsoft
    customers. I think you guys forget this sometimes.
    How can we not be?

    Just thought it was silly to make such a general comment.
    I feel like I can speak with some credibility on this issue
    since this is what I see and do every day...

    Thanks.

    Editor's note: OK. I don't have the space or time to milk a topic as hard as its worth, so I sometimes have to cut to the chase. Certainly, there are probably examples of large businesses that use Linux downloads as the basis for enterprise servers. There are also pirated copies of Windows floating around, and we're not counting those either. From a statistical standpoint, large businesses tend to require systems that are supported. --Paul

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.