Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
October 19, 2006 12:00 AM

Microsoft Ships Internet Explorer 7

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #93945
Rating: (36)

Late yesterday, Microsoft shipped the final version of Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) 7.0 for 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP. IE 7.0 offers many functional and security improvements and puts Microsoft's browser nearly at feature parity with its main competitor, Mozilla Firefox.

IE 7.0's new features include tabbed browsing, integrated search, RSS support, and major display and printing enhancements. On the security front, IE 7.0 offers improvements such as an integrated phishing filter and better defenses against malicious ActiveX controls.

In a recent briefing, Microsoft director of IE product management Gary Schare told me that IE 7.0 had been honed over a steady series of public beta releases and that very little has changed since the last prerelease build, dubbed Release Candidate 1 (RC1). "Since RC1, we only changed one major functional area," Schare said. "We decided to migrate the browser's search-provider settings during upgrades." In response to concerns from Google and Yahoo!, Microsoft will provide customers who upgrade IE with a screen that displays their current search provider and lets them accept or change it.

Schare also highlighted a recent report from technical services firm 3Sharp that concluded that IE 7.0's phishing filter offers the best overall accuracy of any antiphishing solution. He also noted that a few Web-site compatibility problems are no longer "hugely problematic," though some users might temporarily encounter incompatible sites. Given the expected upgrade rate, these problems are likely to be resolved quickly.

Finally, Schare reiterated Microsoft's plans for distributing IE 7.0. Microsoft will release the new browser as a high-priority update through Automatic Updates in about three weeks. However, IE 7.0 will be distributed over time, so it could take two or three months for IE 7.0 to be distributed to all Automatic Update users. Unlike other high-priority updates, IE 7.0 won't be installed automatically. Instead, users will see an advertisement for the browser and choose whether to install it. There's no default choice, Schare said, so users won't run into a situation where IE 7.0 is installed by mistake. Corporations that want to prevent users from accepting the upgrade can download a free nonexpiring blocker tool from the Microsoft Web site.

Users can download IE 7.0 by using the following link:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/downloads/default.mspx

For more information about IE 7.0 and associated download links, please read my exhaustive review on the SuperSite for Windows.

http://www.winsupersite.com/article/reviews/internet-explorer-7-review.aspx

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Will
    6 years ago
    Oct 21, 2006

    "1. They build a rig and install a pirate version of XP from the Internet"

    If you run a 400MB binary from boot, giving it absolute control of your system, you deserve everything you are going to get.

    "2. They build a rig and install a corporate (MSDN/VL) version of XP from their workplace's media set."

    If you do this at a legit company you'll be caught easily.

    "3. They build a rig and install an inexpensive campus license version of XP."

    Now you are just whining because Apple doesn't care enough to have similar relationships with Universities.

    "1. They buy a DELL (etc.), wipe the drive of the OEM preinstall, and install inexpensive campus license version of XP. Since they "purchased" Windows, they feel legit in running their campus licensed copy.

    2. They buy a DELL (etc.), wipe the drive of the OEM preinstalled apps, and install a corporate (MSDN/VL) version of XP from their workplace's media set. Since they "purchased" Windows, they feel legit in running their MSDN copy."

    Whiny Whiny Whine. Boo hoo hoo. Boo hoo hoo. Yes we windows users are evil pirates. Even though 90% of oems install clean builds of XP whenever you spring for the Pro version (usually a 100USD option) we still wipe it all and install our uberhzxxored version.

    ---

    I tell you what. If OSX is so grand, why doesn't apple open it up? Do what ever other modern OS in the world has done. Let it run on any x86 build, just like linux, just like windows, just like the unix variants. Stop protecting and babying it. If it wants to gain the respect of users that use real OS systems, then let it come out and play with the big boys.

    Maybe people will show you the ultimate flattery of theft. Instead of ignoring you and letting you use this ignorance as applied security.

    Absolutely laughable. Tee. Hee. Hee.

  • Vandil
    6 years ago
    Oct 20, 2006

    When Mac OS hit the v10 mark, they used X to symbolize both the number 10 and that the underlying OS is now based on uniX.

    Since then, all new releases of OSX are named with a subnumeral, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, and so on.

    You can think of these as Mac OS 11, Mac OS 12, Mac OS 13, Mac OS 14, if it helps Windows zealots understand.

    And unlike a service pack for a Windows OS, each "point release" is an entirely full OS. In the Mac world, our "service packs" are sub-point releases. e.g. 10.3.9, 10.4.8. In Microsoft lingo that would be Mac OS 13.9 and Mac OS 14.8.

    Understand?


    As for the price of each OS release, Windows zealots only mention money on this point because many of them do not buy their copy of Windows. Here's what they do:

    1. They build a rig and install a pirate version of XP from the Internet
    2. They build a rig and install a corporate (MSDN/VL) version of XP from their workplace's media set.
    3. They build a rig and install an inexpensive campus license version of XP.

    The only time the actually buy a copy of Windows is when it's part of the PC they buy. But even then:

    1. They buy a DELL (etc.), wipe the drive of the OEM preinstall, and install inexpensive campus license version of XP. Since they "purchased" Windows, they feel legit in running their campus licensed copy.

    2. They buy a DELL (etc.), wipe the drive of the OEM preinstalled apps, and install a corporate (MSDN/VL) version of XP from their workplace's media set. Since they "purchased" Windows, they feel legit in running their MSDN copy.

    Truth is, they've never paid for the full version of Windows XP Professional. These same people will never pay for their full version of Windows Vista Ultimate.


    Finally, the only marketshare IE7 is going to take is that of the IE6-onXP/2003 market, and maybe a few thousand non-IE-using people who download it to see how it compares to Firefox for a week, then continue to use Firefox. Downloads of browser != Full-time use of browser.

  • Joe
    6 years ago
    Oct 20, 2006

    lotsa - I've used both Final Cut Pro and Premiere Pro and even used advanced compositing on both. They're nearly identical except for some minor cosmetic differences. Even the default screen layout template is nearly identical. Both are used extensively in the film industry and both support HD formats and non-destructive editing. If you'd get your head out of your @ss and had used both, you'd know that. The original Final Cut software was Macromedia's first foray into the next version of Premiere to keep the product going on Macs, and now that Apple owns the product, Final Cut Pro is just the Mac version of Premiere Pro. I'd rather use Premiere Pro because of newer CPU support on PC's and tighter integration with Adobe After Effects. However, for the most part, Sony Vegas has been a much easier solution, even though I don't use After Effects with it. The Magic Bullet plugin that ships with it is amazing and Sony DVD Architect is 100% faster workflow to get stuff done than Encore DVD (which is not-surprisingly like DVD Studio).

  • hey
    6 years ago
    Oct 20, 2006

    Pr*ck, Apple users generally are smug, at least that ones that I come in to contact with. The iTude at work.

    Grammar in dictionaries? Since when? For proper grammar usage, you use a reference work such as the following:
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0873529863/ref=nosim/aresearchguid-20

    "Microsoft fans == young Republicans"

    I didn't realize that there were so many young Replicans. Nevertheless, I don't get the correlation, and I'm sure you would find the distribution to actually be the opposite.

    "I guess even IBM had its defenders when it was going down in the 80s."

    Which they were right to defend the company, since they are right now a powerhouse in the computer industry. (If I was old enough, I would have loved to have purchased some stock in IBM) Sure they got out of the low-margin PC and laptop business, but they still made over $91 BILLION last year, so I guess they aren't doing too bad these days. And using this metric, MS had almost as much profit as Apple had revenues.

  • Mark
    6 years ago
    Oct 20, 2006

    lotsa -- are you going to end it there or are yuo going to explain a little further?

    bonch/preseton/vandil(all the same idiot)-

    "They [Apple] release minor upgrades to an already established operating system"

    And charge $120 for them!!!!

    On topic - I personally use FF on both the Mac and XP. I have not downloaded IE7 yest, but will probably do so this weekend. I will not judge without first trying it, unlike b.p.v.

    Oh, and thanks for calling me a YOUNG republican. I haven't been called young in a while!!!

    --tayme

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.