Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
July 24, 2002 12:00 AM

AOL Reneges on AIM Interoperability Promise

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #26010
Rating: (0)

   Despite the fact that a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) condition of the AOL Time Warner merger stipulated that the company open up its AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) network to the competition, AOL revealed this week that it has no plans to do so. Instead, the company says, it will now focus on alternative ways to achieve interoperability between AIM and non-AOL networks, citing its recent deal with Apple Computer, which will be the first company other than AOL to ship an AIM-compatible chat client. "While [the AOL/Apple agreement] is not the kind of server-to-server interoperability we and others have looked at, it does represent a way forward that is available now to allow AIM users and users of other communities to exchange messages conveniently," an AOL spokeswoman said this week.

AOL's agreement with the FTC stipulated that the company open up the AIM network to MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, and other competitors, allowing users of these widely used but incompatible networks to exchange text messages, files, and other data with AIM users. The agreement came after AOL's competitors, including Microsoft, complained to the FTC, stating that the AOL Time Warner merger shouldn't be approved until AOL opened up AIM. Before the complaint, Microsoft had worked to let MSN Messenger users access AIM's user base, but AOL shut out Microsoft several times.

AOL says that it must renege on its interoperability promise because of changing market conditions and the technical difficulty of the undertaking. Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but if the task was a condition of the merger, and one AOL openly agreed to, then AOL should be forced to comply. If the government can come down hard on Microsoft for not honoring its legal agreements, it can--and should--come down equally hard on AOL for what is obviously a far more gratuitous violation.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Michael Teplitsky
    10 years ago
    Jul 24, 2002

    I use Trillian. It lets me access all the messengers, ICQ, and IRC at the same time. No need for "messenger wars."

  • brian
    10 years ago
    Jul 24, 2002

    If I want to use MSN Messenger to talk to AOL ScreenNames. Then I should be allowed.

    Quoted from News Story: Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but if the task was a condition of the merger, and one AOL openly agreed to, then AOL should be forced to comply. If the government can come down hard on Microsoft for not honoring its legal agreements, it can--and should--come down equally hard on AOL for what is obviously a far more gratuitous violation.

    ^ - Agreed

  • Eric Hill
    10 years ago
    Jul 24, 2002

    Yes, Microsoft and AOL should be treated equally, but the real solution is for us to get the government out of the business of deciding when businesses should be permitted to merge and under what conditions. The antitrust laws are based on the false economic theory of perfect competition, and should be done away with. If AOL and Time-Warner wanted to merge, they should not have had to ask anyone's permission or agree to "open up" their intellectual property. The fact that AOL would agree to the terms and then renege is certainly indicative of the level of corruption present at that company, but in a world of ambiguous, non-objective, self-contradictory laws such as the antitrust laws, the corrupt have the edge.

    If you want a level playing field, leave all companies, regardless of size, free to do as they wish (modulo force and fraud), because the customers are free to reject their products if we do not like how they behave.

    Eric

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.