Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
December 06, 2006 12:00 AM

Zunestory: Microsoft Talks Zune Expectations

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #94475
Rating: (70)

Stung by recent criticism of the marketing and functionality of its Zune portable media player, Microsoft this week revealed its plans for the device and--in a rare disclosure--its expectations for sales during Zune's first holiday season. According to a Microsoft representative who briefed me about these plans yesterday, the company expects to ship more than 1 million Zune players by the end of its fiscal year, which ends June 30, 2007. That's enough to give Zune 10 to 20 percent of the market currently dominated by the Apple iPod, with which the Zune most closely competes.

Assuming that happens, Zune wouldn't be a total wash, because during last year's holiday season the number-one non-iPod product in the more than-$200 MP3 player market sold only a fraction of that number. It's also worth noting that Zune went from its first whiteboard scribbles to a finished product in about 10 months--a monumental feat for a company that isn't particularly well known for moving quickly.

Many--myself included--have criticized or even decried Microsoft's entry into this market, the underwhelming marketing of the device, and the lack of certain features. Microsoft has admitted to making some mistakes--such as the viral marketing scheme that appears to have fallen flat, in my opinion, with consumers--but it defends its decision to enter this important market now and says it's here for the long haul. I'm told that Microsoft will ship numerous functional updates to the existing Zune player and launch new Zune devices with new form factors and unique features in the next year.

The key to Microsoft's decision to make the Zune, I was told, is that although Apple controls 75 to 80 percent of the overall MP3 player market, Apple almost completely controls the only parts of the market that make money (i.e., large-capacity MP3 players). For all its work creating the underlying technologies for the PlaysForSure initiative, Microsoft watched as its numerous hardware partners managed to collectively steal only tiny amounts of share in the low-end flash memory player market. This business model clearly isn't sustainable.

Speed was another problem. Although Microsoft could do the plumbing work to support new features (e.g., podcasting) as they arrived--and then revise Windows Media Player (WMP) to support those features--getting all its hardware and services partners lined up at the same time to support new features proved to be impossible. For Microsoft to offer any kind of concerted competition for the dominant iPod, it had to do so alone. And Apple had proven that there were billions of dollars to be made in portable music. Thus, the people behind the Zune could champion the potential to Microsoft's leaders.

To ship a product quickly, however, Microsoft had to look at core functionality and try to deliver some key differentiators. Although the Zune does lack several features that the iPod boasts, customers rarely use most of those features anyway, and Microsoft intends to close the gap in time. Furthermore, the Zune does include a few unique features of its own, such as Wi-Fi connectivity and a Send feature that lets Zune users wirelessly share content.

This holiday season is a "beachhead" period for Microsoft, during which it's trying to change people's perceptions of the MP3 player market from "Apple and everyone else" to "Apple and Microsoft and everyone else." From this perspective, the company has been somewhat successful. Despite lukewarm reviews, the Zune is a hotly debated product among influentials. Looking forward, Microsoft intends for Zune to be profitable in 12 to 24 months. "This is the fuel we need to go after Apple on a long-term basis," said the Microsoft representative.

There's a lot more to this story, of course, so I'll provide a more in-depth look at Microsoft's plans for the Zune later this week on the SuperSite for Windows. Stay tuned.
http://www.winsupersite.com/

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Preston
    6 years ago
    Dec 10, 2006

    Vista crashes on basic deep sleep and hibernation (enjoy that BIOS, suckers), while Macs go to sleep flawlessly:

    http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/299

  • Joe
    6 years ago
    Dec 08, 2006

    I've got a Q and it's more reliable than my UT Starcom 6700 Pocket PC (used also by several US providers as well as Telus and Bell in Canada). Lately it had been acting up. Often pressing the power button to turn it on would result in nothing, even if the battery was charged. It's a real pain in the @$$ to have to soft reset it at least once a day and wait 20-30secs for it to power on so I took it in for repair. After about 3 weeks, they concluded that there was a defective RAM chip (of all things). Anyway, I decided to get a Q after that. I use Telus and although I wasn't on a contract, I'd had the 6700 for less than a year and it was still under warranty. They offered to repair or replace it for free, or I could take the Q for $50. I took the Q. They even threw in a free belt clip case with it. The Q has 2 batteries - one standard, one extended - and lasts almost a week on the extended battery without a recharge. I've never had to soft reset it once and I've had it for more than a month now. It's pretty solid.

  • hey
    6 years ago
    Dec 08, 2006

    vandil, the stuff you mention about Windows Mobile has more to do with the hardware manufacturers than it has to do with Windows Mobile itself.

    The devices that lost power would lose information, but if the manufacturers had actually included a backup power source, it would not have been a problem.

    And by mentioning the Q, you forgot to mention that it is made by Motorola, which has a horrible track record in the reliability department. This has nothing to do with Windows Mobile. And I like Palm, but too bad we're still waiting on a more modern OS. Garnet is just getting old, and their attempts to modernize have been going nowhere.

    It won't take the Zune to become bogged down in DRM. We already live in that world, and it isn't only the iTMS DRM. I also don't see how charging the same amount as a comparable iPod is the equivalent to giving it away. And if they were to charge less, one of two things would happen. First, Apple may drop the price, and we would have a nice little price war. Or, Apple could sue MS for dumping. Either way, a competitive market will solve the issue.

    Your comments about this site are naive. Windows Server/IIS can certainly host a competent and effective web site. However, that front end still needs to be designed right. From what I can tell they use WebSideStory for content management, and heavy use of JavaScript. Last I checked, MS has no real involvement with either of those.

    bdk: I made it more than clear that I was changing your words by saying I was going to requote your statement. If this was a more advanced forum, it would have been easier for me to to that, and for everyone else to realize it, but I can't.

  • Bryan
    6 years ago
    Dec 07, 2006

    thoughtyness?

    You're either very clever and have mixed the words thoughtfulness and naughtiness or unaware of the word thoughtfulness's existence.

  • Will
    6 years ago
    Dec 07, 2006

    Actually, iPhone is already trademarked, so sadly, Apple has to think up another name for it.

    Go Canada! And your pre-patenting thoughtyness!

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.