Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

March 23, 2010 10:39 AM

Networking Forecast: Cloudy, with a Chance of Indifference

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #104623
Rating: (54)

My gut has always told me that cloud computing was a bad idea.  I recently lived through an example of how unfortunately right I was.

I run my own email server (which isn't terribly difficult) and needed better spam filtering than I had (which is difficult), so at the advice of some techie friends I decided to run my email through a popular online spam-filter service.  Normally I'm leery of having to write a check to someone every month just to keep my network running, but the price was quite reasonable, so I gave it a try, and it's worked well for me for a few years.  A couple of years ago, a large Internet-centric company acquired that anti-spam service.  I'm not naming names, but the company's got a motto that goes something like "Be good" and whose annual profit in dollars is a really big number, so heck, let's just call them Bignumber.com.

Anyway, Bignumber.com recently tried to charge my credit card and for some reason couldn't get the charge approved, so they started deactivating my account.  Deactivation would eventually mean that I would no longer receive any incoming email unless I were to reconfigure my domain's MX records, which is a pretty easy thing to do, provided I knew to do it.  I had no clue that I needed to, however, because the only way that Bignumber communicates with its customers about this sort of thing is via a free email account in their cloud that Bignumber required me to get to keep the anti-spam service, and I honestly don't think to check that account very often. Had I been able to tell them to talk to me via, say, my Hotmail account, then I'd have known.  I'll spare you the details, but basically I'd been caught in a sort of situation wherein I needed to log onto an account to tell Bignumber to try the credit card again, but couldn't because I'd never used the account—apparently Bignumber created it a year or so ago for me and their other cloud-related customers—and so didn't know the account's password and, when I tried to retrieve the account's password, I was told that the account was deactivated and I couldn't re-activate it without the password.  Okay, it's sort of funny in a Brazil kind of way and frustrating to have lived through, but I bear Bignumber no ill will for that:  sometimes in online systems, Kafka-esque infinite loops happen.  (Heck, it's so true that there's probably a potentially successful t-shirt slogan in the making there.)

So what to do in a case like this, when the computers are being stupid?  Simple:  pick up the phone, talk to a human, and get the whole thing sorted out.  That's where things really went off the rails.  After finally getting a human on the phone, I explained the situation and asked to get someone on the phone who could revivify my account so that I could continue to give them some money every year in return for warding off junk emails.  The result was far more bizarre than my initial Catch-22, as the Bignumber employee explained to me that no one anywhere in the vast Bignumber enterprise would talk to me or any other customer about anything related to the anti-spam service.  I tried explaining the problem in a different way, appealed to our common humanity, begged her to intercede on my behalf, and asked to speak to her supervisor--actually, I engaged in about twenty minutes of explaining, appealing, begging and asking—and always got the same answer. It was sort of the 21st century cloud version of, "I'm sorry, Dave—I'm afraid I can't do that."

In the end, I just worked around the problem. (The good thing about running your own mail server means that you can have as many email addresses as you like, so I could easily just go sign up for the service with a different name.)  But it got me thinking:  what if I depended on this firm for more than just anti-spam?  Imagine what could have happened if I'd bought into the whole cloud computing idea and hosted my web and mail servers in their cloud.  Suppose also in the scenario that something caused the cloud vendor to disable those servers either through some mistake of their network techs or via some billing error. No one would even take my calls as I watched my now server-less business run down the drain?

In any case, that's never going to happen in my online business, as I can't see any way to guarantee my customers the sort of privacy that I promise them unless I run the servers myself.  (Try getting a cloud vendor to post a million dollar bond in the event that your customer data is compromised.)  But I'd ask my readers to consider this:  when the email server's down, would you rather beg your cloud vendor's customer service representative to help you, or tell the guy in your IT department who runs the email servers to get the silly thing fixed, and fixed now?

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • SPANBURGH
    2 years ago
    May 27, 2010

    Only partially agree on some of this Mark. After all, we know that anytime a service is marketed with competition there is a tendency to dumb down the support of the service to save money. The result? Indifference on the part of the Customer disservice folks who know nothing about the technology. They apologize, and take the complaint.
    The experience I endured for the last six weeks with Sears to get my Dryer fixed with seven tech visits to the house and parts that are not in stock proves that it's the organization that will make it happen. We all know that the technology is getting cheaper in the way of hardware and virtulization is making provisioning of the software really fast. So the money has to be spent on responding technical issues quickly and in an effective manner. Without that we will get that "HAL" response from the service company like we get now from some of the firms offering services now. But this is not new. There was a time when most of us had to register our domain name with just one entity. One day our website and email stopped working. No problem with connectivity and my servers were running. Everything worked in house. But someone in Texas that ran once for President decided he wanted to use a domain name, and they gave them ours. Well, when I figured out what happened it was a tractor pull and lots of Lawyer threats to get it resolved. In the end we got our domain name and DNS back and I charge them by the hour for all the days we were down. And yes they paid it.
    Stupid acts are going to happen. So that's why I believe a hybrid approach is needed and indeed that is happening as we speak as firms use things like Share Point to gather and aggregate data that is routed to the on premises IT organization for further processing. With the coming changes in the MSFT offerings there will be a great many changes in our options.But if we can't upgrade the "Carbon Units" we're doomed.
    /:>

  • LORENTZEN
    2 years ago
    Mar 30, 2010

    The content was good, but Minasi's writing is better. I agree with the "cloud" problems - I wouldn't say which company's cloud platform generates the most calls around here, but their advertisement premise is something like "I'm not a MAC". As always, very enjoyable reading.

  • Wood
    2 years ago
    Mar 24, 2010

    You nailed it. I am so sick of overseas customer service reps that cannot pronounce english well enough that I can understand them and who have to pause 5 minutes if you ask a simple question that gets them off their prewritten script. And who in their right mind would trust somebody else to keep the company jewels safe in a world full of IT bandits, bots, and malware? Another name for cloud is fog. I am just not buying the hype.

  • Yarrington
    2 years ago
    Mar 24, 2010

    I couldn't agree more. If you can afford it, it's just better to handle things in house rather than farm out. I know that businesses strike up SLA's and draw up contracts but the fact of the matter is you can hold yourself, or your employee's, much more accountable then you can a serivce company.

  • 2 years ago
    Mar 24, 2010

    Isn't "Cloud Computing" just "Remote Hosting" in a new guise? RH was a good idea when computers and servers were expensive, but mow? Plus the CC vendors assume that the necessary bandwidth is essentially free - a reminder, it's not.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.