Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
January 05, 2009 12:00 AM

On Eve of Macworld, Microsoft Again Highlights 'Apple Tax'

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #101163
Rating: (6)

With the economy in freefall, Microsoft this week continued its discussion of the "Apple Tax," what it says are the additional costs associated with using the Mac platform instead of a Windows-based PC. According to the company, the severity of the Apple Tax has only gotten worse in the past few months, as Apple has released expensive new Macs despite ever-worsening economic conditions. The discussion is occurring the day before Apple opens its Macworld trade show in San Francisco.

"Windows is more compatible than the Mac, but it's also more compatible with today's budgets," Microsoft Corporate Vice President of Windows Consumer Marketing Brad Brooks told me in a briefing on Monday. "Around the globe, people need to balance the interests they have with the realities of the economy. Windows PCs are a better value than Macs, and that's true at every price point."

Microsoft first began discussing the Apple Tax concept in October, just before Apple shipped new Macbook notebook computers that were even more expensive than their predecessors, a curious move given the economy. At the time, much of the discuss was around the cost of switching, comparisons of Macs and PCs at different price points, and the lack of innovative new hardware features. These issues continue to this day, Brooks pointed out. But the problem is exacerbated by the value of Windows, Apple's continued insistence on only serving the high end of the market, and the design aesthetics of Apple hardware, which limits choice.

"Apple fans like to say that the company is like the BMW of the PC world," Brooks said. "Fair enough. But we're Toyota, and we have the Corolla on the low-end and Lexus on the high-end. And both offer tremendous value across the board."

"Microsoft has been delivering low cost technology to the masses for over 30 years," he continued. "And we're going to push this concept of 'Life Without Walls' going forward and explain to people the value they get when they run Windows on the PC, on the Internet, and on their phones." Brooks noted that the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas was an obvious time for make this renewed push for Windows, including Windows Vista and 7 on the PC, Windows Live on the Internet, and Windows Mobile on phones.

"Look, the Apple Tax gap is widening, not shrinking," Brooks said. "And it plays out in so many different ways. There is the upfront cost of the machines, the lack of technology innovation, the compatibility of the devices, the lack of form factor choices, and so much more. The gap has never been greater." Brooks said that Apple machines were luxury items while PCs happy straddle the gap between utility and luxury. "You can get even more technology in Windows at the same price point than you can with a Mac than you could as recently as October," he added.

Brooks hinted that PC users should stay tuned to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's CES keynote address on Wednesday evening. "Let's just say it's going to be an interesting talk," he told me.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Chris
    3 years ago
    Jan 07, 2009

    "The Mac is hardware--hardware that runs both OS X and Windows, which makes it MORE compatible."

    Truly you have a dizzying intellect.

    The reason that PC hardware can't run Mac OS X is because Apple *specifically prohibits this from occuring*. Giving them credit for that is illogical.

  • Emilio
    3 years ago
    Jan 07, 2009

    I'm a Windows expert since the early Windows 95 and before, as well as Mac user at home. I occasionally do computer support for my friends and neighbors (you know the trick). For me the major difference between Mac and Windows is really the user experience. Let's face it, non expert users, are pretty lost when confronted with Windows XP or Vista, even for such simple things everybody needs, as configuring the wireless home broadband access. I recently did that for a couple of friends who own both a Mac and a Vista PC: setting up their wifi was done in seconds on the Mac but took a fair amount of time with errors and retries on the Vista PC. So the Apple tax might very well be dollars, but there is also a Windows tax in grey hair and support needs. For some people, this Mac extra cost is worth it then.
    I would compare this to buying an expensive house downtown versus a big villa with swimming pool in the suburbs for the same or less amount of dollars. There is clearly a "downtown tax" here. But the suburb tax is paid daily in traffic jams or public transports nightmare...

  • sx4sport@hotmail.com
    3 years ago
    Jan 06, 2009

    is that all they have - its waaaay more for less?

    sheesh - no wonder MS is going broke...

    :D

  • Lotsa
    3 years ago
    Jan 06, 2009

    "Apple fans like to say that the company is like the BMW of the PC world," Brooks said. "Fair enough. But we're Toyota..."

    Yep. And guess which of those two companies lost money last quarter?

    "Windows is more compatible than the Mac"

    Windows is an operating system. It's SOFTWARE. The Mac is hardware--hardware that runs both OS X and Windows, which makes it MORE compatible.

    Who the eff is running Microsoft's marketing arm these days?

  • Chris
    3 years ago
    Jan 06, 2009

    I miss the days of the creative trolls.....

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.