Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
January 14, 2010 12:00 AM

Mac Falters As PC Growth Surges, IDC and Gartner Say

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #103438
Rating: (6)

While Apple routinely crows about its heady Mac sales growth numbers, the Cupertino computer maker also conveniently ignores one important fact: It has never exceeded 4 percent worldwide market share in the past decade. And with PC market share results in for the most recent quarter from both IDC and Gartner, Apple has another inconvenient truth to deal with: It actually lost market share, even in the United States, its most successful market.

The reason for Apple's stagnation in the PC market is simple: Macs are too expensive, and today's bestselling computers sell for about one-third the cost of mainstream Macs. "If a company is not in the low-priced market, it's absolutely difficult for it to increase market share," Gartner analyst Mikako Kitagawa said. "And Apple did not do as well as others in share because of its prices."

IDC concurred. "The US [PC] market exploded in the fourth quarter ... with new low price points to stimulate demand and face competition," said IDC research manager David Daoud. "Apple did nothing of the kind: Although it refreshed the iMac desktops and the low-end MacBook in October, it did not follow other computer makers and drop prices during the quarter."

Dropping prices, of course, is not in Apple's DNA. The maker of "the computer for the rest of us" has almost always exclusively targeted the high end of the market, a strategy that has generally paid off well since Steve Jobs' return to the company in late 1996. But the economic downturn has finally hit home for Apple. Though the company's Mac sales in the fourth quarter were strong, growth couldn't keep up with the wider industry, where PC sales jumped 25 percent in the fourth quarter.

The Mac deficit shows up both worldwide and in the United States, and when compared to the previous year and the previous quarter. (Market share is generally compared to the same period from a year earlier.) In the third quarter, when the Mac commanded 9.1 percent market share in the United States, Apple fanatics crowed that the company was closing in on 10 percent. (Many simply describe Mac market share, erroneously, as "about 10 percent.") But this past quarter, the Mac garnered just 7.4 percent of all PC sales in the United States. (It was 7.5 percent in the same quarter a year ago.) And worldwide market share, as always, was under 4 percent.

This reality is contradictory to Apple's aggressive advertising and product promotion and the stance of the company's staunchest defenders. And while the IDC and Gartner market share estimates may be off a percentage point or two—Apple will deliver its actual Mac shipment numbers in about ten days—we'll soon be able to calculate the official results for the fourth quarter of 2009 and calendar year 2009. (I will publish these results, as I have for years, on the SuperSite Blog.)

While Apple's continued inability to make a serious dent in the PC market is nothing new, this news will paradoxically surprise many people. It shouldn't: While Apple has steadily made small gains in the United States and very small gains worldwide each quarter, the Mac has never reached the upper echelon of PC sales in any market over the past decade.

None of this overshadows Apple's influence over the tech industry, however. And there is reason for that influence. The company's iPod players are dominant in the MP3 player market and are the standard by which all other devices are measured worldwide. Apple's iPhone is incredibly popular in the consumer smartphone market (in the United States especially), and is growing at an amazing clip. It's hard to overstate the influence this device has had on smartphones from device makers around the world.

And while the Mac may have plateaued, it is important to realize that the Mac is actually quite successful regardless. Yes, PC makers ship about 300 million PCs worldwide each year, and, yes, the Mac represents just a tiny portion of that number. But the Mac still generates millions in revenues each quarter for Apple. That's nothing to sneeze at, and when you factor in the success of the iPod, iPhone, and iTunes Store, you see an influential ecosystem that will likely continue to pull people into the Mac fold going forward.

So let's not get crazy. We're not reading the Mac's obituary here, far from it. But maybe it's time to be a bit more realistic about where this product fits into the wider scheme of things

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Charles
    2 years ago
    Jan 19, 2010

    Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to say, "Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts."

    Paul says, "Though the company's Mac sales in the fourth quarter were strong, growth couldn't keep up with the wider industry, where PC sales jumped 25 percent in the fourth quarter."

    It's funny that Mac sales "faltered" while increasing 26%, which is faster than PC sales increased.

  • WILLIAM
    2 years ago
    Jan 16, 2010

    I dunno, Paul seemed to acknowledge Apples success and growth and pointed out that pricing may be making them lag behind the PC leaders sales. That's what everyone seems to be saying too, so why are all of you arguing?. We can agree that it may be better, at least in the short run, to net high profits rather than increase market share, but some of us wonder how long this strategy can hold up. Yes, I would rather make a large profit with small volume than the opposite. Any business would also. But these are tougher times and consumers may be passing up more expensive products for those which are 'good enough' to get them through their needs. I guess that time will tell.

  • Christopher
    2 years ago
    Jan 16, 2010

    "You guys are using arguments so selectively it's both sad and laugable."

    Err. I'm not. I have a field that is impossible to use macs. In addition to that I point out that my PC's are half the cost, and my laptops have nice features like a blu ray burner, and other buit-ins which you can't get if you tried. Make whatever pointless car analogy you like, but I can do things you can't. Why I would also put a laptop designed for image concious consumers into a warehouse transacting several hundred thousand units daily, when a tough-book barely lasts 3-6 months is also illogical from any business justification. Actually it would be down right silly which is why Apple products aren't used in Apple warehouses. My present employer, same rules of business apply albeit different field entirely, still zero ROI justification.

    "Oh, and my career field most likely compensates me a lot more than you"

    But the big difference is I'm emotionally stable, don't care what you do, don't care what you make, and am not thoughtless enough to insinuate we should fire a few million people because they don't deploy useless hardware to run software that doesn't exist. Your attitude is to only care, or relate to your immediate situation, and lack empathy towards other choices. I don't care what tools you need to use. Pick whichever is best, do your darn job, and don't presume those tools are remotely useful for others.

    My comments never indicated a comparison to anyone else, just that the field is fundamental to modern life, and simultaneously impossible on your platform. Deal with it.

    "Hence, that's why Safari/OSX usage increased during the weekend"

    Yeah, if true, I still don't care. Doesn't change the reality that most businesses can't contemplate macs for anything other than middle manager desktops... There is a huge data center near here, every time I needed to visit for a survey, there is about 2 billion in hardware there and not one dollar of it wearing an Apple logo.

  • Dr. Gary
    2 years ago
    Jan 16, 2010

    @ Christopher January 15, 2010

    Better specs gives you nothing. Look at Real Madrid; look at the 2002 BMW F1 team.

    Real has the best socces specs in the world, yet managed nothing in recent years. BMW had the strongest engines and managed highest to speeds but did not win the championship.

    You guys are using arguments so selectively it's both sad and laugable.

    Oh, and my career field most likely compensates me a lot more than you and the company I work serves more people worldwide than your company and even your field does.

    And my Macs get everything done. Much more than the Windows-powered laptops do that my colleagues and partners use. In fact, some 80% of them started using Macs at home.

    Hence, that's why Safari/OSX usage increased during the weekend, because people are free to choose what they work with computerwise, not the Windows-stuff they got shoved down their throats because of Microsoft monopoly and gridlock deals.

  • Christopher
    2 years ago
    Jan 15, 2010

    "Because McDonald's serves 95 percent of the Americans."

    Actually my career field highly compensates me, and it's impossible on a Mac (and not "difficult", or "onerous", but impossible). So, alas, the need to pay my mortgage sort of overwhelms my need to own an overpriced computer that can't accomplish anything I need to earn a living. And as I said before, my stuff has better hardware in it than anything Apple sells (for less money), so even buying one of their systems with the intention of using boot camp is just plain dumb.

    Seriously, you people need to get out of your myopic little ditch given that my field employs several million people in this country.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.