Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


January 17, 2005

Microsoft, Massachusetts Reach Accord on Office 2003

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

Microsoft has reached an agreement with Massachusetts that will result in the software giant easing its license restrictions for its Office 2003 document formats in return for the state dropping a previous requirement to only use document formats based on open standards. In early 2004, Massachusetts announced that it would require all state agencies to create and store information in document types based on open standards like HTML.

The goal of the format requirement was to ensure that the state could read digital documents in perpetuity and not have to worry about document conversions down the road if they adopted a format that was later abandoned by its maker. However, under terms of its agreement with Microsoft, Massachusetts has revised its requirement to include so-called "open formats" such as the XML-based document types supported by Office 2003 applications such as Word and Excel.

"[Microsoft has told] us recently [that] they're planning to modify [the Office 2003 document] license," said Eric Kriss, the secretary of administration and finance for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. "If they're to do so, it is our expectation that when we issue the next iteration of standards, then Microsoft's proprietary formats will deemed to be open formats because there are no longer restrictions on use."

In addition to Microsoft's XML-based document formats, Massachusetts will also use the PDF format, which is owned and controlled by Adobe, as well as other common document words such as TXT and RTF. The change is a huge blow to open source advocates, who saw last year's Massachusetts open standards requirement announcement as a win for open source solutions such as Linux and OpenOffice.org. Worldwide, open source solutions have been gaining traction in many country and local governments, but they have yet to see much success in US governmental bodies.

End of Article



Reader Comments
"The change is a huge blow to open source advocates, who saw last year's Massachusetts open standards requirement announcement as a win for open source solutions such as Linux and OpenOffice.org"

This reasoning is flawed and stupid. It's not because a program is open source, that the file formats it uses are necessarily STANDARDS. And a program can be closed source and still support open standard document formats.


Anonymous User January 18, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Right on, 'open source' is distinct in its defintion from 'standards based'. Why business software companies or open source organizations would see the Massachusetts decision as good or bad I don't see why. Heck, Massachusetts could define it's own file format standard to which software companies and open source organizations could design their software to comply with. Anonymous User, you are one smart cookie.

msgstephen January 18, 2005


fs

Anonymous User January 19, 2005


yeah, go MS

Anonymous User January 19, 2005


What's with the lame? Microsoft is just a company of people with hopes and dreams trying to make livings from selling software. I don't see what's wrong with that.

msgstephen January 21, 2005


What a lot of trype from 'msgstephen'; clearly he has never had to support IT&T in a complex work environment. Document format is one of the key issues in a successful archiving strategy. Does msgstephen what his government to loose his title deeds to his property because they no longer have the software to read the electronic document? I think not! Open document standards (as opposed to open software) is a very important issue. HTML is a 'lowest common denominator' that can support complex document layouts. If you don't have Office 2003, try and find a reader/viewer for Office XML documents (the Microsoft one does not work in my experience).

Contributors should think some of these issues through before they follow vendor passions blindly.

Anonymous User January 24, 2005


You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 24, 2008

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including a Vista Capable dismissal request, Zune price reductions, Morrow musings, Novell and Microsoft sitting in a tree ... two years later, Yahoo!, IE 6 on Windows Mobile, and so much more ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

PsExec

This freeware utility lets you execute processes on a remote system and redirect output to the local system. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing